The Source You Trust
Search
800-622-4123
  • About Us |
  • Careers |
  • Contact Us |
  • Learning Center |
  • Log In |
  • My Profile
    • My Contact Information
    • My Email Notifications
    • My Services and Tools
    • Company Administrators
    • Issues Tracking
  • Data Reporting
  • Industry Information
  • Residual Markets
  • Underwriting
  • Agents/Brokers
  • Insights
Search
  • My Profile
    • My Contact Information
    • My Email Notifications
    • My Services and Tools
    • Company Administrators
    • Issues Tracking
  • Data Reporting
  • Industry Information
  • Residual Markets
  • Underwriting
  • Agents/Brokers
  • Insights
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
  • Learning Center
Insights
Court Case Update, Mississippi - September 2021
Court Case Update, Mississippi - September 2021
NCCI Page Content Two
InsightsLegal
 
By NCCI Insights September 13, 2021
 

Page Content

On August 25, 2021, the Mississippi Workers’ Compensation Commission found, in West v. The Nichols Center, that a workers compensation claim for benefits must be denied as there was no substantial evidence presented, either lay or medical, that would show the contraction of COVID-19 was work related.

In its decision, the Commission noted the lack of established precedent in Mississippi regarding compensability for contracting COVID-19 at work. The Commission reasoned that disability resulting from COVID-19 may be compensable only if there is a direct causal connection between the work performed and COVID-19, and that the direct causal connection is supported by medical evidence. The Commission found that, in an analysis of COVID-19 cases, the focus should be on whether there is proof that (1) a claimant is diagnosed with COVID; (2) the claimant has an impairment; (3) the claimant’s COVID-19 caused or significantly aggravated, accelerated, or contributed to the impairment; and (4) the impairment resulting from COVID-19 is causally connected to the employment to a reasonable degree of medical certainty.

The Commission concluded that the claimant—who was employed as a nurse in a nursing home and had the burden of proving the elements of the claim—failed to present medical records or evidence that her positive COVID-19 test result was due to workplace exposure. In addition, the claimant offered ambiguous testimony and could not identify specific incidents of exposure at work. Therefore, the Commission determined that the claim for compensability should be denied as there was no substantial evidence, lay or medical, to support the claim and establish a causal connection between the contraction of COVID-19 as work related.

This decision could be appealed. NCCI will monitor for further developments.

For more information on other cases monitored by NCCI’s Legal Division, visit previous Court Case Updates and Court Case Insights under the Legal section of INSIGHTS on ncci.com.

​This article is provided solely as a reference tool to be used for informational purposes only. The information in this article shall not be construed or interpreted as providing legal or any other advice. Use of this article for any purpose other than as set forth herein is strictly prohibited.
TOP
NCCI Page Content Right Top

​
​
NCCI
Home
About Us
Careers
Contact Us
Website SLA
QUICK LINKS
Events and Programs
Learning Center
Online Invoice Service (View/Pay My Invoice)
Services & Tools Catalog
Solutions
LEGAL
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use

CONNECT WITH US

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to use this site you are giving us your consent to place cookies on your device.

Continue Give me more information